• Home
  • Contact address
  • About me
    • About this blog
  • My considerations
    • Once a son always a son
    • Divorce and Remarriage
    • Divorcio y Nuevo Matrimonio
  • Regarding our future
  • Christ is the answer – Spain
    • Pioneering work
    • Our strategy
    • Donation
    • Latest News
    • Regarding our future
    • Publications
    • Galleries
Simon Desjardins BlogSimon Desjardins Blog
  • Home
  • Contact address
  • About me
    • About this blog
  • My considerations
    • Once a son always a son
    • Divorce and Remarriage
    • Divorcio y Nuevo Matrimonio
  • Regarding our future
  • Christ is the answer – Spain
    • Pioneering work
    • Our strategy
    • Donation
    • Latest News
    • Regarding our future
    • Publications
    • Galleries

The Danger with Similarities

Home DiscernmentThe Danger with Similarities
The Danger with Similarities

The Danger with Similarities

February 17, 2015 Posted by Simon Desjardins Discernment, Reflection

If colors can confuse the substance, resemblance can strike without a blush and mislead us into thinking that something is something else, or that a specific device is useless or unsatisfactory. Hence a person might criticize a banana for being tasteless, unaware he is eating a plantain, or reject the efficiency of an umbrella because a parasol didn’t keep him dry.

The incidents resulting from similarities can oscillate from amusing to frustrating, producing on their way entertainment or disaster. No wonder God exhorts us to not lean on our own understanding (Prov. 3:5). For if Jacob used a counterfeit to deceive Isaac, and Tamar beguiled Judah through semblance, the devil can surely get the best of us unless a greater than ourselves intervenes on our behalf. Discernment belongs to Him and He has the authority to give it to whom He will or take it away (Job 12:20).

A destructive assumption

Of all deceptions caused by similitudes self-deception is the most popular. To make others believe we are what we are not by acting in a suggestive way is bad enough, but to believe we are what we are not, because we behave as those who are, is more destructive than moth and rust combined. And if a person thinks he is untouchable he is, of all people, the most susceptible to be affected by the pharisaic virus, a virus that usually penetrates under the skull, affecting the brain and our sense of judgment.

An instructive analogy

In Isaiah chapter five God compares Israel to a vineyard He had planted on a very fruitful hill. The soil had been prepared, the choicest vine planted, and a tower built in its midst as a symbol of God’s vigilance over it. At last, a winepress was made. For as we read at the end of verse two, He expected the vineyard to bring forth good grapes but it brought forth wild grapes.

We read in the fifteenth chapter of the Gospel of John that God expects us to bear fruit. But which kind of fruit? In Luke 6:44 it is written: “men don’t gather grapes from a bramble bush.” Hence we could conclude that as long as we produce grapes everything is fine. But God says it is not that simple. And it is not that simple because there are grapes and grapes. Not every fruit proceeding from a vine is pleasing to God. In Isaiah chapter five the catch resides in the similarities between wild grapes and good grapes. And here, certainly, the resemblances are highly misleading.

The same is happening in our churches. The similarities between mere evangelicalism and true Christianity are so numerous, and at times so subtle, that the two can be confounded at the point of disorientation. Both adherents can go to the same church, sing the same hymns, pray the same prayers, put money in the same basket, and get baptized in the same water, yet their destination can be poles apart. But if resemblances can hoodwink us they don’t generate any problem for God.

Wild grapes and good grapes

The similarities between wild grapes and good grapes have to do primarily with sight. No wonder the prophet Isaiah affirms that Jesus was not going to judge by the sight of His eyes, nor decide by the hearing of His ears (Isaiah 11:3). The Pharisees, for instance, appeared righteous outwardly but were full of uncleanness inside (Matthew 23:27). Consequently as important as visual perception might be, it cannot function adequately on its own. It must be assisted by other means of discernment. And since reality is both material and spiritual, spiritual discernment is needed to distinguish a spiritual actuality from another (1 Corinthians 2:14).

If we return to the wild grape and the good grape the main difference between them has to do with their taste. One is sour, the other sweet. The former proceeds from the wild, the latter from the Vinedresser’s care. While the first grew in its untamed freedom, the second matured in subjection, under the merciful hand of wisdom and grace. Hence one is pleasing to God, the other is not.

Listen to what God says about His vineyard: “For the vineyard of the Lord of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah are His pleasant plant. He looked for justice, but behold, oppression; for righteousness, but behold, a cry for help” (Isaiah 5:7). Now it could be contended that while there are similarities between good grapes and wild grapes, there are no such resemblances between justice and oppression, or righteousness and a cry for help (tyranny, see James 5:4). Yet God maintains that religious camouflage is so pervasive and efficient that oppression can be mistaken for justice, and tyranny for righteousness.

In Isaiah 5:7 justice and righteousness stand for good grapes while oppression and tyranny stand for wild grapes. In Hebrew there is a meaningful play of words. The word translated ‘justice’ is מִשְׁפָּט mishpat, and the word translated ‘oppression’ is מִשְׂפָּח mispach. Both are highly similar. Nevertheless their meaning is exceedingly different. The same is to be applied to ‘righteousness’ and ‘a cry’. The former is from the word צְדָקָה tsĕdaqah, the latter from the word צְעָקָה tsa`aqah. The resemblance is striking.

There are several lessons one can learn here. The first is that it is possible for a person to deceive himself by justifying something wrong or canonizing a sinful practice. Unfortunately what has been done is being done, and fishes are being converted into lions.

Another effect of such maquillage is that some people are led to believe that a Christian has the taste of a rotten apple, or that saints are no better than pagans. The sad thing about it is that presently little can be done to eradicate the deception. That we like it or not, at the present, tares and wheat share the same field (Matthew 13:29), and sheep and goats sit on the same bench (Matthew 25:32). But let us not be fooled by religious maquillage or evangelical coloring. Let us eat butter and honey so we may be able to discern between what is of God and what is not (Isaiah 7:15).

Conclusion

All considered it boils down to this: “If anyone wills do His will, he shall know…” (John 7:170). So what about them who don’t? You will see them taking a parasol on a rainy day and getting scared by the roaring of a fish. As for those who know better, watchfulness is imperative. After all, Joshua got deceived by the Gibeonites because he walked by sight for a time (Joshua 9:3–15). May God help us to learn from Him so we may avoid similar traps.


If you think this post can help somebody you can share it with the options presented bellow.

Share this:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Related

Tags: DiscernmentReflection
Share
51

About Simon Desjardins

Simon was born in Canada in 1955 in a little village called Saint Donat de Rimouski in the province of Québec. Since 1975 he has been working with the “Christ is the Answer Ministries” in such countries as Italy, France, Portugal and Spain. In 1984 he became director of “Christ is the Answer – Spain” (See menu bar). He has lectured in several countries worldwide and a few years ago he began to write as his schedule permits. Three books were published as a result, all of them in Spanish and one of them in French and English. He is married and has two children.

You also might be interested in

Spiritual Understanding (part 1)

Spiritual Understanding (part 1)

Jul 19, 2016

Since a wide variety of subjects can be understood through[...]

About Knowledge

About Knowledge

Jun 14, 2017

As I have pointed out in previous writings, there is[...]

God’s secret place

God’s secret place

May 15, 2024

In this brief post I would like to draw your[...]

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives

Tags

Beauty deception Discernment Discipleship Faith Growth Inspirational Knowledge Love Prayer Reflection Song of Solomon stability

Recent Posts

  • The removal of the lampstand
  • Reasoning from the Scriptures (part two)
  • Reasoning from the Scriptures (part one)
  • Why this waste!
  • The fury of the oppressor
  • Faith in the working of God
  • Inventing things in our heart
  • A mighty invitation
  • Taming the tongue
  • A few remarks about running
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

Contact Us

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Send Message

© 2025 — Highend WordPress Theme. Theme by HB-Themes.

Prev Next
 

Loading Comments...